Since Nadal won the U.S. Open, last major tournament was missing in his collection, he revived the debate about which player is the best of all time. Comparisons are always odious, but inevitable.
Federer has been compared to Bjorn Borg, Pete Sampras, Jimmy Connors, among others, and in most cases, the Swiss noted above all for success.
But now that Rafa Nadal managed to also enter the select group of winners of the Career Grand Slam is looking to dethrone Roger Federer of his well-earned place as the greatest of all time.
Here I present an interesting comparison of the first 10 years of professional inter Roger Federer (1998-2007) and Rafael Nadal (2001-2010). These are the titles:
ATP TOUR
RF: 23
RN: 14
Grand Slams
RF: 12
RN: 9
ATP World Tour Masters 1000
RF: 14
RN: 18
ATP World Tour Finals (before Masters Cup)
RF: 4
RN: 0
Olympics:
RF : 0
RN: 1
Total titles:
RF: 53
RN: 42
course is 5 years younger than R. Federer, and what has been achieved so far is impressive, but if we analyze and compare what was done by the Swiss is even more than did the English in the same period of years.
why I maintain that you can not argue that Roger Federer is still by far the best of all time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment